Prüm Convention

The PrümConvention which provides for the exchange of DNA, Fingerprint, and vehicle data across the EU was signed on 27th May 2005 at Prüm, Germany by the following EU states

  • Belgium
  • Germany
  • Spain
  • French Republic
  • Luxembourg
  • Netherlands
  • Austria

The convention allows for the exchange all DNA, fingerprint and vehicle data. It contains provisions for the deployment of armed sky marshals on intra-Schengen flights, joint police patrols, and entry of armed police forces into another state. Also it is possible that a foreign police officer responsible for an operation in another state may, in thoery, decide how far the local police forces take part in the operation. The Prüm Convention, also know as the Prüm Treaty or Schengen III Agreement, was adopted into EU regulations for Schengen states in June 2007.

The UK has also joined the convention, with Home Office Minister Joan Ryan signing the treaty in Luxembourg, in June 2007. Joan Ryan (pictured) is a Labour MP for Enfield North. She voted for the national ID card scheme, for student load top up fees, for the Iraq war, and for the Labour anti-terror laws. She also voted against an investigation into an Iraq war. The UK has opted out of the principle within the Prüm Convention that allows foreign police officers to enter another state, without prior consent or notice.

Due to the nature of the data exchange under this convention/treaty this has provided a lot of discussion and concern amongst commentators and law makers both in the House of Commons, House of Lords alike

On 22nd April 2008 David Davies, the shadow home secretary, asked for an update from Jacqui Smith (the Home Secretary) on the state of this UK’s process of joining the Prum Convention. Jacqui Smith stated:

“The EU Council Decision on the stepping up of cross-border co-operation (also know as the Prum Council Decision) provides improved arrangements for the sharing of fingerprint, DNA and vehicle registration data by law enforcement authorities. For example, where a DNA sample retrieved from a crime scene is searched against a national database and no match is found, the Council Decision permits for that data to be transmitted and searched through member states’ national databases. A notification is sent to the requesting member state notifying of a hit or no hit i.e. matching profile. If a match is identified, further requests for information are processed through existing secure police channels allowing for appropriate data protection safeguards.

The UK expects to begin sharing data in this way within three years of adoption and publication of the legal text”

In 2007 the European Data Protection Supervisor (Mr Peter Hustinx) commented that “the Prüm Convention has been set up as a ‘laboratory’ for cross border exchange of information, in particular DNA and fingerprints.”

The House of Lords has raised numerous issues with the Prum Convention in their report PRUM CONVENTION: EFFECTIVE WEAPON AGAINST TERRORISM AND CRIME?

During this report they raised the concern that the data the exchange could be “unfair”, due to the DNA collection policies of the UK, which are out of kilter with the rest of the EU and the world. The House of Lords Stated that:

“The exchange of information, particularly by reciprocal access to national databases, must be subject to accountability. It needs appropriate guarantees as to the accuracy and security of the data, as well as procedures for recording data exchanges, and restrictions on the use of information exchanged”

The reason the UK is out of kilter with the rest of the world is due to several changes in the law, that allows the police to take and retain DNA to be kept for people who are innocent of any crime. This particular issue is being challenged in the ECHR in the case of S and Marper v UK

Despite these concerns the German Presidency, who are pushing the Prum Convention, did not engage to the House of Lords who were reporting on the Prum Convention. The Lords stated “”We put on record our regret that the German Presidency should have been unwilling to discuss with the Committee of a national Parliament an initiative to which we, like them, attach great importance.

As the UK DNA Database increases dramatically (it already exceed 4.5 million records), there is increasing concern about this database and therefore the exchange of data. The UK’s Information Commissioner has statedI welcome a debate on the future of the [DNA] database especially as there is unfairness with the current system and the issue has received little public debate to date. However, to extend the database further has serious implications for people’s privacy in this country.” This is compounded by the fact that there are numerous errors with the DNA database, including 550,000 miss spelt names.

Other postings on the subject are:

DNA Exchange across the EU

Data Sharing of DNA and Fingerprints within the EU Continues

Dutch View on Prum use

Memo regarding the Prum Convention prum-convention

About these ads

6 Responses to “Prüm Convention”

  1. Prum Convention - Netherlands « Data - Where is it? Says:

    […] Convention – Netherlands The Dutch who are also signatories of the Prum convention view the Convention (or Treaty) as method of controlling immigration. The Dutch Government clearly […]

  2. DNA Exchange across EU « Data - Where is it? Says:

    […] Who collects, controls, and searches it? « DNA Database used for familiar searches Prüm Convention […]

  3. Prüm Convention & Schengen III « Data - Where is it? Says:

    […] – Where is it? Where is your data? Who collects, controls, and searches it? « Prüm Convention Wesminster Ends CCTV with Microphones […]

  4. S. and Michael Marper v. The United Kingdom (DNA Retention) « Data - Where is it? Says:

    […] the fact that the UK collection is not the same as the rest of the EU, during their report in the Prum Convention which allows for sharing of DNA and Fingerprint information across the […]

  5. Data sharing of DNA and Fingerprints within EU continues « Data - Where is it? Says:

    […] Data sharing of DNA and Fingerprints within EU continues The UK goverment is pushing forward with plans to share data, with the EU, under what is known as the Prum Convention. […]

  6. Italy has reserveations about Prum Convention « Data - Where is it? Says:

    […] has reserveations about Prum Convention The Italian government has reservations about the Prum Convention/Treaty for several reasons; their primary concern is the exchange of DNA within the […]


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 32 other followers

%d bloggers like this: