CCTV workers on voyeurism charge

In 2005 four council workers were accused of using  CCTV cameras to spy on a woman in her house, for voyeuristic purposes.  In 2006, two of them were found guilty of voyeuris and sentenced to two months in prison.

Four council workers from Merseyside who allegedly used CCTV cameras as a “peeping tom” tool have been charged with voyeurism.

It is claimed the men, who worked for Sefton Council, pointed a street safety camera into a woman’s flat.

All four were also charged on Thursday with misconduct in a public office.

They are: Kevin Judge, 42, of Waterloo, Vincent David Broderick, 52, of Sefton, David Welsh, 40, of Anfield, and Mark Summerton, 37, of Kirkdale. At the time of the alleged incident, in November last year, the men were employed in the council’s CCTV operation centre in Bootle.

Mr Summerton, of Humber Close, and Mr Broderick, of Waterside, also face a further charge of attempted voyeurism on a separate occasion.

A spokeswoman for Merseyside Police said the men would appear before South Sefton Magistrates on 27 May.

Sefton Council has 70 cameras in Bootle, Waterloo, Crosby, Litherland, Netherton, Aintree and Southport. The exact location of the cameras in question has not been disclosed.

In January 2006 Mark Sefton, pictured above was sentenced to two months in prison, for Voyeurism and then required to sign the sex offenders act.

At the trial the Judge said that “You only have to read the impact statements of the lady to realise the harrowing effect that this had on her. Her life has almost been ruined, her self-confidence entirely destroyed by the thought that prying male eyes have entered her flat”

This was originally reported by the BBC in 2005.

Advertisements

7 Responses to “CCTV workers on voyeurism charge”

  1. Data Protection Act - 12 month Sentance « Data - Where is it? Says:

    […] incident a long with cases of lost documents, rogue CCTV operators, and lost records, shows that the government has very few effective safe guards over […]

  2. CCTV used to obtain naked images « Data - Where is it? Says:

    […] In 2005 CCTV operators were also used cameras for voyeuristic purposes […]

  3. CCTV used to record couple having sex. « Data - Where is it? Says:

    […] CCTV operators also used CCTV cameras for voyeuristic purposes in […]

  4. Security guards turn CCTV cameras onto nearby homes « Data - Where is it? Says:

    […] purposes. Twice in 2005 CCTV operators were involved similar activities. One involved CCTV spying on a woman and another involved operators recording people having […]

  5. No Hats Please: CCTV « Data - Where is it? Says:

    […] Perhaps dark glasses should also be banned, or curtains at home? Those net curtains must really hinder the CCTV operators viewing pleasure. […]

  6. UAV - from War Zone to Your Home « Data - Where is it? Says:

    […] that can be hovered outside people bedrooms, the operators would never watch people for their own voyeristic purposes, would […]

  7. האח הגדול – המעקב המתגבר אחרי הפרט « ילקוט התבונה Says:

    […] בעוד בישראל התופעה רק בתחילתה, בבריטניה התופעה בשיאה והיא כיום המדינה המערבית המרושתת ביותר במצלמות. לכן מקרים של שימוש לא הגון במידע חשאי נפוצים יותר במדינה זו. כך לדוגמה, בשנת 2008 הורשע שוטר בריטי שניסה לסחוט עבריינים שהשתחררו מהכלא, בחשיפת מידע סודי אליו נחשף בעקבות גישה למערכת המחשוב המשטרתית. עובדים שאחראים על המצלמות בבריטניה צילמו והקליטו זוג במהלך יחסי מין, הפנו את המצלמות לתוך בתים וחדרים של אנשים פרטיים שלא היה כלפיהם כל חשד פלילי או בטחוני ועקבו אחרי אנשים שחשדו בהם בניהול רומן עם בני זוגם. […]


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: