Data Theft: Statistics 2008 (restropsective)

Looking back on data loss and  data theft 2008, immediately shows that it was not a good year for data protection. Even just a cursory review of the headlines showed it was a bad year for those charged with looking after our data.

However the ITRC (Identity Theft Resource Center) has now completed a more detailed study into data breaches in 2008.

The, ITRC report, not unsurprisingly, showed a sharp increase in the amount of data theft in 2008. With almost a 50% rise in “reported”  data thefts/breaches, from446 in 2007 to 656 in 2008.

In total it was reported to the ITRC that 35 milion data records were lost or stolen. This, it should be emphasised is on the statistics that were collated by ITRC, and no doubt the real figure is much much higher.

It is also reported that “insider data theft” increased to 16%, almost double the 2007 figure.

Sadly only a fraction of the records (2.4%) were encrypted, which is a tragedy, as it is  simple way to protect the data.

Advertisements

2 Responses to “Data Theft: Statistics 2008 (restropsective)”

  1. Data Theft: 2009 Predictions « Data - Where is it? Says:

    […] Data – Where is it? Where is your data? Who collects, controls, and searches it? « Data Theft: Statistics 2008 (restropsective) […]

  2. Data Theft: Wolverine « Data - Where is it? Says:

    […] and market, not investing in software to protect them is foolish in the extreme. With detailed data theft statistics available for 2008, and predictions of an increase in data theft for 2009, the companies involved really have no […]


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: